[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 08:41:53 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] megaraid_sas: set virt_boundary_mask in the scsi
host
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:02:07AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > scsi_change_queue_depth(sdev, device_qd);
> >
> What happened to the NOMERGES queue flag?
Quote from the patch description:
"Also remove the bogus nomerges flag, merges do take the virt_boundary
into account."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists