[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 09:33:37 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
Cc: "kan.liang@...ux.intel.com" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/CPU: Add more Icelake model number
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 07:13:18AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
> During internal co-work, based on Kan's original patch, I got the
> "#define" in the Ice Lake group sorted by model number(the header of
> the file requires the sorting) and added my SOB. Dropping my SOB or
> adding a text "[Qiuxu: Get the macros in the Ice Lake group sorted
> by model number.]" at the end of the commit message - which one is
> better/clear for you?
I'll add that note when applying.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists