[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190607175413.GA29187@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 19:54:13 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Eric Wong <e@...24.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] aio: simplify read_events()
Change wait_event_hrtimeout() to not call __wait_event_hrtimeout()
if timeout == 0, this matches other _timeout() helpers in wait.h.
This allows to simplify its only user, read_events(), it no longer
needs to optimize the "until == 0" case by hand.
Note: this patch doesn't use ___wait_cond_timeout because _hrtimeout()
also differs in that it returns 0 if succeeds and -ETIME on timeout.
Perhaps we should change this to make it fully compatible with other
helpers.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
fs/aio.c | 9 +++------
include/linux/wait.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index 5bdbef0..2bb3f2e 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -1289,12 +1289,9 @@ static long read_events(struct kioctx *ctx, long min_nr, long nr,
* the ringbuffer empty. So in practice we should be ok, but it's
* something to be aware of when touching this code.
*/
- if (until == 0)
- aio_read_events(ctx, min_nr, nr, event, &ret);
- else
- wait_event_interruptible_hrtimeout(ctx->wait,
- aio_read_events(ctx, min_nr, nr, event, &ret),
- until);
+ wait_event_interruptible_hrtimeout(ctx->wait,
+ aio_read_events(ctx, min_nr, nr, event, &ret),
+ until);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index b6f77cf..ddb9596 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ do { \
({ \
int __ret = 0; \
might_sleep(); \
- if (!(condition)) \
+ if (!(condition) && (timeout)) \
__ret = __wait_event_hrtimeout(wq_head, condition, timeout, \
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); \
__ret; \
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ do { \
({ \
long __ret = 0; \
might_sleep(); \
- if (!(condition)) \
+ if (!(condition) && (timeout)) \
__ret = __wait_event_hrtimeout(wq, condition, timeout, \
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); \
__ret; \
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists