linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] clk: bcm2835: fix memork leak on unfree'd pll struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190607190331.8B06020868@mail.kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 07 Jun 2019 12:03:30 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] clk: bcm2835: fix memork leak on unfree'd pll struct

Quoting Colin King (2019-06-07 03:45:33)
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The pll struct is being allocated but not kfree'd on an error return
> path when devm_clk_hw_register fails.  Fix this with a kfree on pll
> if an error occurs.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak")
> Fixes: b19f009d4510 ("clk: bcm2835: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs")

I suspect this problem was there before this commit, but OK.

> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> index 770bb01f523e..90584deaf416 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> @@ -1310,8 +1310,10 @@ static struct clk_hw *bcm2835_register_pll(struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman,
>         pll->hw.init = &init;
>  
>         ret = devm_clk_hw_register(cprman->dev, &pll->hw);
> -       if (ret)
> +       if (ret) {
> +               kfree(pll);
>                 return NULL;
> +       }
>         return &pll->hw;
>  }

Aren't there more leaks in this driver?