[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02874ECE860811409154E81DA85FBB589674F4D9@ORSMSX121.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 20:12:33 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH][next][V2] ixgbe: fix potential u32 overflow on shift
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin King [mailto:colin.king@...onical.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2019 11:19 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>; David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; intel-wired-
> lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH][next][V2] ixgbe: fix potential u32 overflow on shift
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The u32 variable rem is being shifted using u32 arithmetic however
> it is being passed to div_u64 that expects the expression to be a u64.
> The 32 bit shift may potentially overflow, so cast rem to a u64 before
> shifting to avoid this. Also remove comment about overflow.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Fixes: cd4583206990 ("ixgbe: implement support for SDP/PPS output on X550
> hardware")
> Fixes: 68d9676fc04e ("ixgbe: fix PTP SDP pin setup on X540 hardware")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>
> V2: update comment
Thanks Colin!
Acked-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Regards,
Jake
>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c | 14 ++++----------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
> index 2c4d327fcc2e..0be13a90ff79 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
> @@ -205,11 +205,8 @@ static void ixgbe_ptp_setup_sdp_X540(struct
> ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
> */
> rem = (NS_PER_SEC - rem);
>
> - /* Adjust the clock edge to align with the next full second. This
> - * assumes that the cycle counter shift is small enough to avoid
> - * overflowing when shifting the remainder.
> - */
> - clock_edge += div_u64((rem << cc->shift), cc->mult);
> + /* Adjust the clock edge to align with the next full second. */
> + clock_edge += div_u64(((u64)rem << cc->shift), cc->mult);
> trgttiml = (u32)clock_edge;
> trgttimh = (u32)(clock_edge >> 32);
>
> @@ -291,11 +288,8 @@ static void ixgbe_ptp_setup_sdp_X550(struct
> ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
> */
> rem = (NS_PER_SEC - rem);
>
> - /* Adjust the clock edge to align with the next full second. This
> - * assumes that the cycle counter shift is small enough to avoid
> - * overflowing when shifting the remainder.
> - */
> - clock_edge += div_u64((rem << cc->shift), cc->mult);
> + /* Adjust the clock edge to align with the next full second. */
> + clock_edge += div_u64(((u64)rem << cc->shift), cc->mult);
>
> /* X550 hardware stores the time in 32bits of 'billions of cycles' and
> * 32bits of 'cycles'. There's no guarantee that cycles represents
> --
> 2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists