linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Don't stop walking closids when a locksetup group is found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fe2ceae9-9aeb-bad5-ed24-ca80f0297cf3@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jun 2019 10:39:46 +0100
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Don't stop walking closids when a
 locksetup group is found

Hi,

On 06/06/2019 14:08, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: dfe9674b04ff x86/intel_rdt: Enable entering of pseudo-locksetup mode.
> 
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.7, v5.0.21, v4.19.48.

> v5.1.7: Failed to apply!  Possible dependencies:>     7390619ab9ea ("x86/resctrl: Move per RDT domain initialization to a separate function")
> 
> v5.0.21: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     7390619ab9ea ("x86/resctrl: Move per RDT domain initialization to a separate function")
That's cleanup, I don't think you want for stable. I'll do a backport.


> v4.19.48: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     2a7adf6ce643 ("x86/intel_rdt: Fix initial allocation to consider CDP")

This one changed an adjacent line.


>     723f1a0dd8e2 ("x86/resctrl: Fixup the user-visible strings")
>     7390619ab9ea ("x86/resctrl: Move per RDT domain initialization to a separate function")

> How should we proceed with this patch?

I'll come up with backports for v5.1.x/v5.0.x and v4.19.x once this reaches mainline.


Thanks,

James