linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/20] dt-bindings: display, renesas,du: Update 'vsps' in example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190607113657.GC7593@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jun 2019 14:36:57 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka.xm@...esas.com>, muroya@....co.jp,
        VenkataRajesh.Kalakodima@...bosch.com,
        Harsha.ManjulaMallikarjun@...bosch.com,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] dt-bindings: display, renesas,du: Update 'vsps' in
 example

Hi Geert,

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 10:00:23PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:50 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:22:03PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >> Update the 'vsps' property structure in the documentation example to
> >> reflect what's actually implemented in the device tree sources.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
> 
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> >> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Example: R8A7795 (R-Car H3) ES2.0 DU
> >>                        <&cpg CPG_MOD 722>,
> >>                        <&cpg CPG_MOD 721>;
> >>               clock-names = "du.0", "du.1", "du.2", "du.3";
> >> -             vsps = <&vspd0 0>, <&vspd1 0>, <&vspd2 0>, <&vspd0 1>;
> >> +             vsps = <&vspd0 0 &vspd1 0 &vspd2  &vspd0 1>;
> >
> > The former is simpler to read than the latter in my opinion. Shouldn't
> > we update the .dtsi files instead ?
> 
> Yes, it is easier to read (for humans).
> 
> >>               cmms = <&cmm0 &cmm1 &cmm2 &cmm3>;
> 
> Perhaps we want grouping here, too?

As there's a single entry per CMM it matters less in my opinion. I'm
fine with either options.

> 
> >>
> >>               ports {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart