[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec764ff4-f68a-fce5-ac1e-a4664e1123c7@c-s.fr>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 17:31:01 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mm: Generalize and rename notify_page_fault() as
kprobe_page_fault()
Le 07/06/2019 à 12:34, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
> Very similar definitions for notify_page_fault() are being used by multiple
> architectures duplicating much of the same code. This attempts to unify all
> of them into a generic implementation, rename it as kprobe_page_fault() and
> then move it to a common header.
>
> kprobes_built_in() can detect CONFIG_KPROBES, hence new kprobe_page_fault()
> need not be wrapped again within CONFIG_KPROBES. Trap number argument can
> now contain upto an 'unsigned int' accommodating all possible platforms.
>
> kprobe_page_fault() goes the x86 way while dealing with preemption context.
> As explained in these following commits the invoking context in itself must
> be non-preemptible for kprobes processing context irrespective of whether
> kprobe_running() or perhaps smp_processor_id() is safe or not. It does not
> make much sense to continue when original context is preemptible. Instead
> just bail out earlier.
>
> commit a980c0ef9f6d
> ("x86/kprobes: Refactor kprobes_fault() like kprobe_exceptions_notify()")
>
> commit b506a9d08bae ("x86: code clarification patch to Kprobes arch code")
>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
> Testing:
>
> - Build and boot tested on arm64 and x86
> - Build tested on some other archs (arm, sparc64, alpha, powerpc etc)
>
> Changes in RFC V3:
>
> - Updated the commit message with an explaination for new preemption behaviour
> - Moved notify_page_fault() to kprobes.h with 'static nokprobe_inline' per Matthew
> - Changed notify_page_fault() return type from int to bool per Michael Ellerman
> - Renamed notify_page_fault() as kprobe_page_fault() per Peterz
>
> Changes in RFC V2: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10974221/)
>
> - Changed generic notify_page_fault() per Mathew Wilcox
> - Changed x86 to use new generic notify_page_fault()
> - s/must not/need not/ in commit message per Matthew Wilcox
>
> Changes in RFC V1: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10968273/)
>
> arch/arm/mm/fault.c | 24 +-----------------------
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 24 +-----------------------
> arch/ia64/mm/fault.c | 24 +-----------------------
> arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 23 ++---------------------
> arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 16 +---------------
> arch/sh/mm/fault.c | 18 ++----------------
> arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c | 16 +---------------
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 21 ++-------------------
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 9 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> index 443d980..064dd15 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -458,4 +458,20 @@ static inline bool is_kprobe_optinsn_slot(unsigned long addr)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static nokprobe_inline bool kprobe_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> + unsigned int trap)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
ret is pointless.
> +
> + /*
> + * To be potentially processing a kprobe fault and to be allowed
> + * to call kprobe_running(), we have to be non-preemptible.
> + */
> + if (kprobes_built_in() && !preemptible() && !user_mode(regs)) {
> + if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, trap))
don't need an 'if A if B', can do 'if A && B'
> + ret = 1;
can do 'return true;' directly here
> + }
> + return ret;
And 'return false' here.
Christophe
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists