linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/69] 4.14.124-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190607163823.GA3922@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:38:23 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/69] 4.14.124-stable review

On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 06:32:03PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:27:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 06:16:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:11:02AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.124 release.
> > > > > There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Responses should be made by Sun 09 Jun 2019 03:37:08 PM UTC.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'btrfs_add_link':
> > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6590:27: error: invalid initializer
> > > >    struct timespec64 now = current_time(&parent_inode->vfs_inode);
> > > >                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6592:35: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from type 'struct timespec64'
> > > >    parent_inode->vfs_inode.i_mtime = now;
> > > >                                    ^
> > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6593:35: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from type 'struct timespec64'
> > > >    parent_inode->vfs_inode.i_ctime = now;
> > > >                                    ^
> > > 
> > > What arch?  This builds for me here.  odd...
> > > 
> > 
> > arm, i386, m68k, mips, parisc, xtensa, ppc, sh4
> > 
> > It was originally seen with v4.14.123-69-gcc46c1204f89 last night,
> > but I confirmed that v4.14.123-70-g94c5316fb246 is still affected.
> 
> Ok, let me dig into this after dinner, I think it's due to the
> timespec64 change that happened before 4.19 (where this error is not
> showing up...)
> 

Quite likely. Note that more architectures may be affected - I don't build
btrfs for each architecture, only for architectures where allmodconfig
is error-free and for architectures supported by qemu.

Guenter