linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] apparmor bug fixes for v5.3-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:40:48 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc:     LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] apparmor bug fixes for v5.3-rc4

On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:39 PM John Johansen
<john.johansen@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Can you please pull the following bug fixes for apparmor

No I can not.

You have for some completely unrecognizable reason rebased OTHER PEOPLES WORK.

There are two new apparmor commits in there, but there are also 89
random rebased patches from the networking tree.

What is going with all the security subsystem issues? Why does this
garbage keep on happening, and why are the security trees doing this
when everybody else has learnt.

DO NOT REBASE. NOT EVER. YOU CLEARLY DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING.
"git rebase" and "git merge" are not commands you should ever EVER
EVER use, because you don't seem to understand what they do.

I'm seriously fed up with all the security subsystem by now. This is
not ok. It's not even one person, it seems to be a common issue where
people do completely odd things that make zero sense.

                   Linus