[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190607172023.GL20269@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 19:20:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in
hardware
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:08:04PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Right, I took that branch, squashed the locking fix into patch 2,
> fixed up the remaining patches, and then redid the last patch.
>
> I plan to send the result as a v4 of this patchset with all the links,
> version history, etc. Is that what you mean?
Yap, exactly!
> Sorry, if I misunderstood.
No worries, we're on the same page now :-)
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists