[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190608180626.30589-14-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 20:06:25 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/14] pwm: meson: add support PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED when disabling
meson_pwm_apply() has to consider the PWM polarity when disabling the
output.
With enabled=false and polarity=PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL the output needs to
be LOW. The driver already supports this.
With enabled=false and polarity=PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED the output needs
to be HIGH. Implement this in the driver by internally enabling the
output with the same settings that we already use for "period == duty".
This fixes a PWM API violation which expects that the driver honors the
polarity also for enabled=false. Due to the IP block not supporting this
natively we only get "an as close as possible" to 100% HIGH signal (in
my test setup with input clock of 24MHz and measuring the output with a
logic analyzer at 24MHz sampling rate I got a duty cycle of 99.998475%
on a Khadas VIM).
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
index 900d362ec3c9..bb48ba85f756 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static void meson_pwm_disable(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm)
static int meson_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct pwm_state *state)
{
+ struct meson_pwm_channel *channel = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
struct meson_pwm *meson = to_meson_pwm(chip);
int err = 0;
@@ -252,7 +253,27 @@ static int meson_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
return -EINVAL;
if (!state->enabled) {
- meson_pwm_disable(meson, pwm);
+ if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) {
+ /*
+ * This IP block revision doesn't have an "always high"
+ * setting which we can use for "inverted disabled".
+ * Instead we achieve this using the same settings
+ * that we use a pre_div of 0 (to get the shortest
+ * possible duration for one "count") and
+ * "period == duty_cycle". This results in a signal
+ * which is LOW for one "count", while being HIGH for
+ * the rest of the (so the signal is HIGH for slightly
+ * less than 100% of the period, but this is the best
+ * we can achieve).
+ */
+ channel->pre_div = 0;
+ channel->hi = ~0;
+ channel->lo = 0;
+
+ meson_pwm_enable(meson, pwm);
+ } else {
+ meson_pwm_disable(meson, pwm);
+ }
} else {
err = meson_pwm_calc(meson, pwm, state);
if (err < 0)
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists