[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190608022333.60c42636@oasis.local.home>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 02:23:33 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/14 v2] function_graph: Rewrite to allow multiple
users
On Thu, 30 May 2019 18:29:20 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > OK, so this series isn't enough to allow kretprobes to use it yet. OK,
> > I plan on still keeping it because it does allow for placing function
> > graph tracer into instances with their own filters.
>
> OK, that will be a "regs" extension.
> >
> > I'll look into adding a REGS flag like we do with ftrace_ops.
> >
> > Does the return need all regs? Or is just the return code good enough?
>
> Since it depends on arch, I think all regs we need. And for the entry
> handler, we need all.
When I get back home, I'm going to push this series to linux-next. And
then I'll start adding the REGS extension for the next Linux release
after this series gets in.
Thanks for looking at it.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists