linux-kernel - RE: [RFC v3 0/3] vfio_pci: wrap pci device as a mediated device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 9 Jun 2019 13:40:02 +0000
From:   "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC:     "kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@...el.com>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "jean-philippe.brucker@....com" <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
        "peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC v3 0/3] vfio_pci: wrap pci device as a mediated device

> From Alex Williamson
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 9:03 PM
> To: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Cc: kwankhede@...dia.com; Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@...el.com>;
> baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com; Sun, Yi Y <yi.y.sun@...el.com>; joro@...tes.org; jean-
> philippe.brucker@....com; peterx@...hat.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> kvm@...r.kernel.org; yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com; iommu@...ts.linux-
> foundation.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/3] vfio_pci: wrap pci device as a mediated device
> 
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 08:44:57 +0000
> "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Sorry to disturb you. Do you want to review on this version or review a rebased
> version? :-) If rebase version is better, I can try to do it asap.
> 
> Hi Yi,
> 
> Perhaps you missed my comments on 1/3:
> 
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg187282.html
> 
> In summary, it looks pretty good, but consider a file name more consistent with the
> existing files and prune out the code changes from the code moves so they can be
> reviewed more easily.  Thanks,

Thanks for the remind, Alex. So sorry I made changes in a "disordered".
I've made the changes accordingly. Pls refer to my latest post just now :-)

Regards,
Yi Liu