[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190609164129.477690330@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:41:40 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Yihao Wu <wuyihao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.1 29/70] NFSv4.1: Again fix a race where CB_NOTIFY_LOCK fails to wake a waiter
From: Yihao Wu <wuyihao@...ux.alibaba.com>
commit 52b042ab9948cc367b61f9ca9c18603aa7813c3a upstream.
Commit b7dbcc0e433f "NFSv4.1: Fix a race where CB_NOTIFY_LOCK fails to wake a waiter"
found this bug. However it didn't fix it.
This commit replaces schedule_timeout() with wait_woken() and
default_wake_function() with woken_wake_function() in function
nfs4_retry_setlk() and nfs4_wake_lock_waiter(). wait_woken() uses
memory barriers in its implementation to avoid potential race condition
when putting a process into sleeping state and then waking it up.
Fixes: a1d617d8f134 ("nfs: allow blocking locks to be awoken by lock callbacks")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #4.9+
Signed-off-by: Yihao Wu <wuyihao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -6867,7 +6867,6 @@ struct nfs4_lock_waiter {
struct task_struct *task;
struct inode *inode;
struct nfs_lowner *owner;
- bool notified;
};
static int
@@ -6889,13 +6888,13 @@ nfs4_wake_lock_waiter(wait_queue_entry_t
/* Make sure it's for the right inode */
if (nfs_compare_fh(NFS_FH(waiter->inode), &cbnl->cbnl_fh))
return 0;
-
- waiter->notified = true;
}
/* override "private" so we can use default_wake_function */
wait->private = waiter->task;
- ret = autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, flags, key);
+ ret = woken_wake_function(wait, mode, flags, key);
+ if (ret)
+ list_del_init(&wait->entry);
wait->private = waiter;
return ret;
}
@@ -6904,7 +6903,6 @@ static int
nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
{
int status = -ERESTARTSYS;
- unsigned long flags;
struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp = request->fl_u.nfs4_fl.owner;
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
struct nfs_client *clp = server->nfs_client;
@@ -6914,8 +6912,7 @@ nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *stat
.s_dev = server->s_dev };
struct nfs4_lock_waiter waiter = { .task = current,
.inode = state->inode,
- .owner = &owner,
- .notified = false };
+ .owner = &owner};
wait_queue_entry_t wait;
/* Don't bother with waitqueue if we don't expect a callback */
@@ -6928,21 +6925,14 @@ nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *stat
add_wait_queue(q, &wait);
while(!signalled()) {
- waiter.notified = false;
status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd))
break;
status = -ERESTARTSYS;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
- if (waiter.notified) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
- continue;
- }
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-
- freezable_schedule_timeout(NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT);
+ freezer_do_not_count();
+ wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT);
+ freezer_count();
}
finish_wait(q, &wait);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists