[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90329b94-6cac-63dd-acad-a04c0d283a83@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:19:15 +0100
From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
To: Huw Davies <huw@...eweavers.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/19] kernel: Unify update_vsyscall implementation
On 10/06/2019 10:34, Huw Davies wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 03:15:15PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
>> With the definition of the unified vDSO library the implementations of
>> update_vsyscall and update_vsyscall_tz became quite similar across
>> architectures.
>>
>> Define a unified implementation of this two functions in kernel/vdso and
>
> ... of these two functions ...
Thanks for this, I will fix in v7.
>
>> provide the bindings that can be implemented by every architecture that
>> takes advantage of the unified vDSO library.
--
Regards,
Vincenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists