linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Qualcomm QCS404 PCIe support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190610112134.GA30098@redmoon>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:21:41 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Qualcomm QCS404 PCIe support

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:33:47PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:31:55PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:57:07PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > This series adds support for the PCIe controller in the Qualcomm QCS404
> > > platform.
> > > 
> > > Bjorn Andersson (3):
> > >   PCI: qcom: Use clk_bulk API for 2.4.0 controllers
> > >   dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add QCS404 to the binding
> > >   PCI: qcom: Add QCS404 PCIe controller support
> > > 
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.txt     |  25 +++-
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c        | 113 ++++++++----------
> > >  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Applied to pci/qcom for v5.3, thanks.
> > 
> > Lorenzo
> 
> Hello Lorenzo,
> 
> I don't see these patches in linux-next.
> 
> It appears that only Bjorn Helgaas tree is in linux-next, and not yours.
> 
> I think that it makes a lot of sense for patches to cook in linux-next
> for as long a possible.
> 
> Perhaps you and Bjorn Helgaas could have a shared PCI git tree?
> Or perhaps you could add your tree to linux-next?
> ..or some other solution :)

I ask Bjorn to pull branches into linux-next at appropriate times
that fit our schedules, be patient and this code will be in -next
shortly.

Lorenzo