[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190610113708.GE11076@merlot.physics.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:37:08 +0100
From: Huw Davies <huw@...eweavers.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/19] kernel: Standardize vdso_datapage
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 12:07:45PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> On 10/06/2019 11:31, Huw Davies wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:17:48AM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> >> On 10/06/2019 10:27, Huw Davies wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 03:15:13PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/include/vdso/datapage.h
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >>>> +#ifndef __VDSO_DATAPAGE_H
> >>>> +#define __VDSO_DATAPAGE_H
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#include <linux/bits.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/time.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#define VDSO_BASES (CLOCK_TAI + 1)
> >>>> +#define VDSO_HRES (BIT(CLOCK_REALTIME) | \
> >>>> + BIT(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) | \
> >>>> + BIT(CLOCK_BOOTTIME) | \
> >>>> + BIT(CLOCK_TAI))
> >>>> +#define VDSO_COARSE (BIT(CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE) | \
> >>>> + BIT(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE))
> >>>> +#define VDSO_RAW (BIT(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW))
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#define CS_HRES_COARSE 0
> >>>> +#define CS_RAW 1
> >>>
> >>> CS_HRES_COARSE seems like a confusing name choice to me. What you
> >>> really mean is not RAW.
> >>>
> >>> How about CS_ADJ to indicate that its updated by adjtime?
> >>> CS_XTIME might be another option.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I divided the timers in 3 sets (HRES, COARSE, RAW), CS_HRES_COARSE refers to the
> >> first two and CS_RAW to the third. I will ad a comment to explain the logic in
> >> the next iteration.
> >
> > I'm thinking ahead about a possible CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW_COARSE (which
> > would be useful at least for Wine). In that case you'd have four clock
> > types non-raw and raw, each with either hres or coarse.
> >
>
> Thanks for this, I was not aware of CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW_COARSE.
> I tried to find, though, some details, but I could not find any. Could you
> please provide some reference?
It doesn't exist yet ;-) However it doesn't seem crazy that such a
clock should exist. I was really using it to illustrate that
raw / non-raw is orthogonal to hres / coarse.
That being said, this really doesn't matter that much.
Huw.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists