linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP2+: Make some variables static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190610121843.GY5447@atomide.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 05:18:43 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     paul@...an.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP2+: Make some variables static

Hi,

* Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> [190413 07:18]:
> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> 
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:532:25: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio_hwmod_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:542:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio1_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:562:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio2_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:582:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio3_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static?

I just noticed this is still pending, sorry for the delay. Applying into
omap-for-v5.3/soc.

Regards,

Tony