[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190610143146.GA19565@amd>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:31:46 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Amber Lin <Amber.Lin@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 46/51] drm/amdgpu/soc15: skip reset on init
Hi!
> From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
>
> commit 5887a59961e2295c5b02f39dbc0ecf9212709b7b upstream.
>
> Not necessary on soc15 and breaks driver reload on server cards.
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c
> @@ -495,6 +495,11 @@ int soc15_set_ip_blocks(struct amdgpu_de
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + /* Just return false for soc15 GPUs. Reset does not seem to
> + * be necessary.
> + */
> + return false;
> +
> if (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU)
> adev->nbio_funcs = &nbio_v7_0_funcs;
> else if (adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA20)
Something is seriously wrong here.
Upstream commit goes to soc15_need_reset_on_init() and creates dead
variable and quite a bit of dead code. Is that intended?
But this stable version... goes to different function, and returns
false in function returning 0/-EINVAL, simulating success. New place
does not seem right; it seems like patch misplaced it.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists