[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190610150200.8A32220859@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:01:59 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
afaerber@...e.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com, linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: actions: Fix factor clk struct member access
Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-06-08 12:53:11)
> Since the helper "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" is shared between factor
> and composite clocks, using the factor clk specific helper function
> like "hw_to_owl_factor" to access its members will create issues when
> called from composite clk specific code. Hence, pass the "factor_hw"
> struct pointer directly instead of fetching it using factor clk specific
> helpers.
>
> This issue has been observed when a composite clock like "sd0_clk" tried
> to call "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" resulting in pointer dereferencing
> error.
>
> Fixes: 4bb78fc9744a ("clk: actions: Add factor clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
I agree with Andreas on the function name. With that change you can add
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists