lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:16:03 -0700
From:   santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com
To:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: ti_sci: Add support for processor control



On 6/10/19 5:19 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 08/06/2019 00:35, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com wrote:
>> On 6/5/19 3:33 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>> Texas Instrument's System Control Interface (TI-SCI) Message Protocol
>>> is used in Texas Instrument's System on Chip (SoC) such as those
>>> in K3 family AM654 SoC to communicate between various compute
>>> processors with a central system controller entity.
>>>
>>> The system controller provides various services including the control
>>> of other compute processors within the SoC. Extend the TI-SCI protocol
>>> support to add various TI-SCI commands to invoke services associated
>>> with power and reset control, and boot vector management of the
>>> various compute processors from the Linux kernel.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>>> ---
>>> Hi Santosh, Nishanth, Tero,
>>>
>>> Appreciate it if this patch can be picked up for the 5.3 merge window.
>>> This is a dependency patch for my various remoteproc drivers on TI K3
>>> SoCs. Patch is on top of v5.2-rc1.
>>>
>> I will pick this up for 5.3.
> 
> Santosh,
> 
> There is a pile of drivers/firmware changes for ti-sci, which have cross 
> dependencies, and will cause merge conflicts also as they touch same file.
> 
> Do you mind if I setup a pull-request for these all and send it to you? 
> They are going to be on top of the keystone clock pull-request I just 
> sent today though, otherwise it won't compile (the 32bit clock support 
> has dependency towards the clock driver.)
> 
That will be great Tero.

Regards,
Santosh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ