[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190610172428.3t6laheazlz2y3br@treble>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:24:28 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] static_call: Simple self-test module
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:08:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 8 ++++++++
> lib/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/test_static_call.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1955,6 +1955,14 @@ config TEST_STATIC_KEYS
>
> If unsure, say N.
>
> +config TEST_STATIC_CALL
> + tristate "Test static call"
> + depends on m
> + help
> + Test the static call interfaces.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
Any reason why we wouldn't just make this a built-in boot time test?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists