[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190611173545.GE143729@dtor-ws>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:35:45 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cheiny@...aptics.com, aduggan@...aptics.com,
benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - clear irqs before set irqs
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:55:58AM +0800, Aaron Ma wrote:
>
> On 6/10/19 12:55 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 05:41:59PM +0100, Aaron Ma wrote:
> >> rmi4 got spam data after S3 resume on some ThinkPads.
> >> Then TrackPoint lost when be detected by psmouse.
> >> Clear irqs status before set irqs will make TrackPoint back.
> > Could you please give me an idea as to what this spam data is?
> >
>
> It should be some data 0 during suspend/resume.
> Actually I don't know how these data 0 is produced.
> Not all synaptics touchpads have this issue.
>
> > In F03 probe we clear all pending data before enabling the function,
>
> Yes we did, but not after resume.
Yes, I understand that. The question I was asking: if we add code
consuming all pending data to f03->suspend(), similarly to what we are
doing at probe time, will it fix the issue with trackstick losing
synchronization and attempting disconnect?
>
> > maybe the same needs to be done on resume, instead of changing the way
> > we handle IRQ bits?
>
> This patch is supposed to clear irq status like it in fn probe. Not
> changing IRQ bits.
What I meant is changing how we enable IRQ bits. I would really prefer
we did not lose IRQ state for other functions when we enable interrupts
for given function.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists