lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hqw83c9ZHtQ7NwscGRZUNFwTA9RuUAafnjjkcY4FEGwAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:34:49 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 11 (net/dsa/tag_sja1105.c)

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 21:30, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/11/19 2:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190607:
> >
>
> on i386:
>
> #
> # Library routines
> #
> # CONFIG_PACKING is not set
>
> ld: net/dsa/tag_sja1105.o: in function `sja1105_rcv':
> tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x40b): undefined reference to `packing'
> ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x423): undefined reference to `packing'
> ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x43e): undefined reference to `packing'
> ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x456): undefined reference to `packing'
> ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x471): undefined reference to `packing'
>
>
> Should this driver select PACKING?
>
>
> --
> ~Randy

Hi Randy,

Yes it should, thanks for pointing it out.
Are you going to send a patch, or should I?

Thanks!
-Vladimir

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ