linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: no need to check return value of debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190611185656.GB4659@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:56:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create
 functions

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:44:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:32:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
> 
> What is the user-visible feedback when, say, debugfs_create_file()
> fails?

All of the memory in your system is now gone and it would have long
locked up a while before this call ever happened :)

And no user functionality should ever change if a debugfs call fails, or
succeeds, this is debugging only.

> And what happens when debugfs_create_file() passes in a NULL root?

The file ends up in the root of debugfs.  But as this can only happen if
the system is dead, I wouldn't worry about it.

thanks,

greg k-h