linux-kernel - Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] b43legacy broken on G4 PowerBook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 01:46:23 +0300
From:   Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
To:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@...osoft.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] b43legacy broken on G4 PowerBook

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 05:20:12PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> It is obvious that the case of a mask smaller than min_mask should be
> handled by the IOMMU. In my system, CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT is selected. All
> other CONFIG variables containing IOMMU are not selected. When
> dma_direct_supported() fails, should the system not try for an IOMMU
> solution? Is the driver asking for the wrong type of memory? It is doing a
> dma_and_set_mask_coherent() call.

I don't think we have IOMMU on G4. On G5 it should work (I remember fixing
b43 issue on G5, see 4c374af5fdee, unfortunately all my G5 Macs with b43
are dead and waiting for re-capping).

A.