[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190611062817.18412-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:28:10 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 06/13] ima: Use designated initializers for struct ima_event_data
Designated initializers allow specifying only the members of the struct
that need initialization. Non-mentioned members are initialized to zero.
This makes the code a bit clearer (particularly in ima_add_boot_aggregate)
and also allows adding a new member to the struct without having to update
all struct initializations.
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 13 +++++++++----
security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
index 78eb11c7ac07..c0cf4bcfc82f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
@@ -139,8 +139,10 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
{
struct ima_template_entry *entry;
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
- struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, file, filename, NULL, 0,
- cause};
+ struct ima_event_data event_data = { .iint = iint,
+ .file = file,
+ .filename = filename,
+ .violation = cause };
int violation = 1;
int result;
@@ -294,8 +296,11 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
int result = -ENOMEM;
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
struct ima_template_entry *entry;
- struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, file, filename, xattr_value,
- xattr_len, NULL};
+ struct ima_event_data event_data = { .iint = iint,
+ .file = file,
+ .filename = filename,
+ .xattr_value = xattr_value,
+ .xattr_len = xattr_len };
int violation = 0;
if (iint->measured_pcrs & (0x1 << pcr))
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
index 993d0f1915ff..368ef658a1cd 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ static int __init ima_add_boot_aggregate(void)
const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM";
struct ima_template_entry *entry;
struct integrity_iint_cache tmp_iint, *iint = &tmp_iint;
- struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, NULL, boot_aggregate_name,
- NULL, 0, NULL};
+ struct ima_event_data event_data = { .iint = iint,
+ .filename = boot_aggregate_name };
int result = -ENOMEM;
int violation = 0;
struct {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists