[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190611062817.18412-14-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:28:17 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 13/13] ima: Allow template= option for appraise rules as well
It's useful being able to specify a different IMA template on appraise
policy rules, so allow it.
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 6463ab8921ea..1ac1ef458f2e 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -1110,7 +1110,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
break;
case Opt_template:
ima_log_string(ab, "template", args[0].from);
- if (entry->action != MEASURE) {
+ if (entry->action != MEASURE &&
+ entry->action != APPRAISE) {
result = -EINVAL;
break;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists