[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdfc817d1dcdc83f5bc45f0ab12cbce0c61e6702.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:58:12 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@...osoft.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] b43legacy broken on G4 PowerBook
On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 08:08 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 03:56:33PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > The reason I think it sort-of-mostly-worked is that to get more
> > than
> > 1GB of RAM, those machines use CONFIG_HIGHMEM. And *most* network
> > buffers aren't allocated in Highmem.... so you got lucky.
> >
> > That said, there is such as thing as no-copy send on network, so I
> > wouldn't be surprised if some things would still have failed, just
> > not
> > frequent enough for you to notice.
>
> Unless NETIF_F_HIGHDMA is set on a netdev, the core networkign code
> will bounce buffer highmem pages for the driver under all
> circumstances.
... which b43legacy doesn't set to the best of my knowledge ...
Which makes me wonder how come it didn't work even with your patches ?
AFAIK, we have less than 1GB of lowmem unless the config has been
tweaked....
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists