linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/15] binfmt_flat: use _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXvbA=+=AQ6fYV2zRUc6CWtZ_GzEN7D5b8QNYwLEd6OjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:25:46 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
        "moderated list:H8/300 ARCHITECTURE" 
        <uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] binfmt_flat: use __be32 for the on-disk format

Hi Christoph,

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:21 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> So far binfmt_flat has onl been supported on 32-bit platforms, so the
> variable size of the fields didn't matter.  But the upcoming RISC-V
> nommu port supports 64-bit CPUs, and we now have a conflict between
> the elf2flt creation tool that always uses 32-bit fields and the kernel
> that uses (unsigned) long field.  Switch to the userspace view as the
> rest of the binfmt_flat format is completely architecture neutral,
> and binfmt_flat isn't the right binary format for huge executables to
> start with.
>
> While we're at it also ensure these fields are using __be types as
> they big endian and are byteswapped when loaded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

> --- a/include/linux/flat.h
> +++ b/include/linux/flat.h

> @@ -67,19 +67,19 @@ struct flat_hdr {
>  #define OLD_FLAT_RELOC_TYPE_BSS                2
>
>  typedef union {
> -       unsigned long   value;
> +       u32             value;
>         struct {
>  # if defined(mc68000) && !defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE)
> -               signed long offset : 30;
> -               unsigned long type : 2;
> +               s32     offset : 30;
> +               u32     type : 2;
>  #      define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -               unsigned long type : 2;
> -               signed long offset : 30;
> +               u32     type : 2;
> +               s32     offset : 30;
>  #      define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */
>  # elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -               signed long offset : 30;
> -               unsigned long type : 2;
> +               s32     offset : 30;
> +               u32     type : 2;
>  #      define OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM    0x1 /* load program entirely into RAM */

The definitions of OLD_FLAT_FLAG_RAM are identical, so could be
factored out.
However, they appear to be unused.

>  # else
>  #      error "Unknown bitfield order for flat files."

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds