[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1560243127.13886.3.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:52:07 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Maxime Jourdan <mjourdan@...libre.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] media: videodev2: add
V4L2_FMT_FLAG_FIXED_RESOLUTION
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 15:39 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> I am wondering if this flag shouldn't be inverted: you set
> V4L2_FMT_FLAG_DYN_RESOLUTION if dynamic resolution is supported,
> otherwise it isn't.
>
> Can all the existing mainlined codec drivers handle midstream
> resolution changes?
>
> s5p-mfc, venus and mediatek can, but I see no SOURCE_CHANGE event in
> the coda drivers, so I suspect that that can't handle this.
>
> Philipp, what is the status of the coda driver for dynamic resolution
> changes?
FTR, to my knowledge there is no dynamic resolution change support in
the firmware, as there is no signal (interrupt nor picture run return
value) to indicate that different headers were parsed.
I am planning to add the initial source change event required by the
current decoder API documentation, but I am afraid there will be no
support for source changes due to mid-stream resolution changes due to
firmware limitations.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists