lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:07:24 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx4: prevent undefined shift in set_user_sq_size()

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:28:49AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 12:22:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The ucmd->log_sq_bb_count is a u8 that comes from the user.  If it's
> > larger than the number of bits in an int then that's undefined behavior.
> > It turns out this doesn't really cause an issue at runtime but it's
> > still nice to clean it up.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c
> > index 5221c0794d1d..9f6eb23e8044 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c
> > @@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int set_user_sq_size(struct mlx4_ib_dev *dev,
> >  			    struct mlx4_ib_create_qp *ucmd)
> >  {
> >  	/* Sanity check SQ size before proceeding */
> > -	if ((1 << ucmd->log_sq_bb_count) > dev->dev->caps.max_wqes	 ||
> > +	if (ucmd->log_sq_bb_count > 31					 ||
> > +	    (1 << ucmd->log_sq_bb_count) > dev->dev->caps.max_wqes	 ||
> 
> Surely this should use check_shl_overflow() ?
> 

Same for the other one I sent.  I'll resend in a couple days.  No rush.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ