[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEU1=Pk2HVHApjRkAtL0H1wa6GUejs4af3KodQ8TgJmJ6bh-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:18:58 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
To: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
iri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Abort disabling secondary CPUs if wakeup is pending
Hi Rafael/Thomas,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:03 AM Pavankumar Kondeti
<pkondeti@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> When "deep" suspend is enabled, all CPUs except the primary CPU
> are hotplugged out. Since CPU hotplug is a costly operation,
> check if we have to abort the suspend in between each CPU
> hotplug. This would improve the system suspend abort latency
> upon detecting a wakeup condition.
>
Please let me know if you have any comments on this patch.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists