[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190611150427.GA29288@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:04:27 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
Cc: cohuck@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, david@...morbit.com,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, adilger kernel <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
zwisler@...nel.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
dave jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, jstaron@...gle.com,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
vishal l verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, david@...hat.com,
willy@...radead.org, hch@...radead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
jmoyer@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
kilobyte@...band.pl, rdunlap@...radead.org, riel@...riel.com,
yuval shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>, stefanha@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, dan j williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
lcapitulino@...hat.com, kwolf@...hat.com, nilal@...hat.com,
tytso@....edu, xiaoguangrong eric <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
darrick wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, imammedo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/7] dm: enable synchronous dax
On Tue, Jun 11 2019 at 9:10am -0400,
Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for the review Please find my reply inline.
>
> >
> > dm_table_supports_dax() is called multiple times (from
> > dm_table_set_restrictions and dm_table_determine_type). It is strange
> > to have a getter have a side-effect of being a setter too. Overloading
> > like this could get you in trouble in the future.
> >
> > Are you certain this is what you want?
>
> I agree with you.
>
> >
> > Or would it be better to refactor dm_table_supports_dax() to take an
> > iterate_devices_fn arg and have callers pass the appropriate function?
> > Then have dm_table_set_restrictions() caller do:
> >
> > if (dm_table_supports_dax(t, device_synchronous, NULL))
> > set_dax_synchronous(t->md->dax_dev);
> >
> > (NULL arg implies dm_table_supports_dax() refactoring would take a int
> > *data pointer rather than int type).
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> I am sending below patch as per your suggestion. Does it look
> near to what you have in mind?
Yes, it does.. just one nit I noticed inlined below.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> index 350cf0451456..8d89acc8b8c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
...
> @@ -1910,8 +1919,13 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,
> }
> blk_queue_write_cache(q, wc, fua);
>
> - if (dm_table_supports_dax(t, PAGE_SIZE))
> + if (dm_table_supports_dax(t, device_supports_dax, &page_size)) {
> +
No need for an empty newline here ^
> blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DAX, q);
> + if (dm_table_supports_dax(t, device_synchronous, NULL))
> + set_dax_synchronous(t->md->dax_dev);
> + }
> else
> blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DAX, q);
>
Thanks,
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists