[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B949445@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:40:41 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: stmmac: Start adding phylink support
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> If this is not used, I don't really see the point of splitting this from
> the rest of the patch. Also, I don't see the point of all those NULL
> initialisers either.
Thanks for the feedback. Please see previous discussion here that lead
to the introduction of this patch [1].
I can squash it into 3/3 but the diff of that patch will look even worse
...
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1110489/
Thanks,
Jose Miguel
Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists