lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190612154122.GB21828@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:41:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mce: no need to check return value of
 debugfs_create functions

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:18:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:15:31PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
> > 
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> > Cc: <x86@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> > Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
> > Cc: Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c     | 16 +++++---------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/inject.c   | 34 +++++-------------------------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c | 14 +++---------
> >  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> I think I'm having a deja-vu:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190122215326.GM26587@zn.tnic

Ah, I thought I had sent this out before...

Anyway, I'll fix this up, but really, you will not have a debugfs file
fail creation unless the system is totally out of memory...

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ