[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190612155231.19448-1-andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:52:30 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
kernel@...labora.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: kmemleak: change error at _write when kmemleak is disabled
According to POSIX, EBUSY means that the "device or resource is busy",
and this can lead to people thinking that the file
`/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak/` is somehow locked or being used by other
process. Change this error code to a more appropriate one.
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
---
Hello,
This time I've added the mailing list, not only the maintainers.
Changes in v2:
- Remove pr_error.
- Replace EINVAL for EPERM, since the command isn't invalid, in fact, the
user don't have the permission to trigger commands when kmemleak is
disabled.
- Reword the commit message to be clearer the rationale behind the
patch.
mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 9dd581d11565..848333a591fa 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ static ssize_t kmemleak_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buf,
}
if (!kmemleak_enabled) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
+ ret = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists