[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190612173013.GD12415@pauld.bos.csb>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:30:13 -0400
From: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
To: Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] cpuset: restore sanity to
cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback()
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:50:48AM -0400 Joel Savitz wrote:
> In the case that a process is constrained by taskset(1) (i.e.
> sched_setaffinity(2)) to a subset of available cpus, and all of those are
> subsequently offlined, the scheduler will set tsk->cpus_allowed to
> the current value of task_cs(tsk)->effective_cpus.
>
> This is done via a call to do_set_cpus_allowed() in the context of
> cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() made by the scheduler when this case is
> detected. This is the only call made to cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback()
> in the latest mainline kernel.
>
> However, this is not sane behavior.
>
> I will demonstrate this on a system running the latest upstream kernel
> with the following initial configuration:
>
> # grep -i cpu /proc/$$/status
> Cpus_allowed: ffffffff,fffffff
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-63
>
> (Where cpus 32-63 are provided via smt.)
>
> If we limit our current shell process to cpu2 only and then offline it
> and reonline it:
>
> # taskset -p 4 $$
> pid 2272's current affinity mask: ffffffffffffffff
> pid 2272's new affinity mask: 4
>
> # echo off > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online
> # dmesg | tail -3
> [ 2195.866089] process 2272 (bash) no longer affine to cpu2
> [ 2195.872700] IRQ 114: no longer affine to CPU2
> [ 2195.879128] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
>
> # echo on > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online
> # dmesg | tail -1
> [ 2617.043572] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 2 APIC 0x4
>
>
> We see that our current process now has an affinity mask containing
> every cpu available on the system _except_ the one we originally
> constrained it to:
>
> # grep -i cpu /proc/$$/status
> Cpus_allowed: ffffffff,fffffffb
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-1,3-63
>
> This is not sane behavior, as the scheduler can now not only place the
> process on previously forbidden cpus, it can't even schedule it on
> the cpu it was originally constrained to!
>
> Other cases result in even more exotic affinity masks. Take for instance
> a process with an affinity mask containing only cpus provided by smt at
> the moment that smt is toggled, in a configuration such as the following:
>
> # taskset -p f000000000 $$
> # grep -i cpu /proc/$$/status
> Cpus_allowed: 000000f0,00000000
> Cpus_allowed_list: 36-39
>
> A double toggle of smt results in the following behavior:
>
> # echo off > /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control
> # echo on > /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control
> # grep -i cpus /proc/$$/status
> Cpus_allowed: ffffff00,ffffffff
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-31,40-63
>
> This is even less sane than the previous case, as the new affinity mask
> excludes all smt-provided cpus with ids less than those that were
> previously in the affinity mask, as well as those that were actually in
> the mask.
>
> With this patch applied, both of these cases end in the following state:
>
> # grep -i cpu /proc/$$/status
> Cpus_allowed: ffffffff,ffffffff
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-63
>
> The original policy is discarded. Though not ideal, it is the simplest way
> to restore sanity to this fallback case without reinventing the cpuset
> wheel that rolls down the kernel just fine in cgroup v2. A user who wishes
> for the previous affinity mask to be restored in this fallback case can use
> that mechanism instead.
>
> This patch modifies scheduler behavior by instead resetting the mask to
> task_cs(tsk)->cpus_allowed by default, and cpu_possible mask in legacy
> mode. I tested the cases above on both modes.
>
> Note that the scheduler uses this fallback mechanism if and only if
> _every_ other valid avenue has been traveled, and it is the last resort
> before calling BUG().
>
> Suggested-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 6a1942ed781c..515525ff1cfd 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -3254,10 +3254,23 @@ void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cpumask *pmask)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback - final fallback before complete catastrophe.
> + * @tsk: pointer to task_struct with which the scheduler is struggling
> + *
> + * Description: In the case that the scheduler cannot find an allowed cpu in
> + * tsk->cpus_allowed, we fall back to task_cs(tsk)->cpus_allowed. In legacy
> + * mode however, this value is the same as task_cs(tsk)->effective_cpus,
> + * which will not contain a sane cpumask during cases such as cpu hotplugging.
> + * This is the absolute last resort for the scheduler and it is only used if
> + * _every_ other avenue has been traveled.
> + **/
> +
> void cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> rcu_read_lock();
> - do_set_cpus_allowed(tsk, task_cs(tsk)->effective_cpus);
> + do_set_cpus_allowed(tsk, is_in_v2_mode() ?
> + task_cs(tsk)->cpus_allowed : cpu_possible_mask);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> /*
> --
> 2.18.1
>
I think this makes a lot more sense that what it currently does.
Fwiw,
Acked-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cheers,
Phil
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists