linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/2] iommu: arm-smmu: Don't blindly use first SMR to calculate mask

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <CAOCk7Nocb7VO5xCcuK1FAPVdPr9U-7z8qOL4yt3ig=05e7brgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:58:35 -0600
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Patrick Daly <pdaly@...eaurora.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] iommu: arm-smmu: Don't blindly use first SMR to
 calculate mask

On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 3:09 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> With the SMRs inherited from the bootloader the first SMR might actually
> be valid and in use. As such probing the SMR mask using the first SMR
> might break a stream in use. Search for an unused stream and use this to
> probe the SMR mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>

I don't quite like the situation where the is no SMR to compute the mask, but I
think the way you've handled it is the best option/

I'm curious, why is this not included in patch #1?  Seems like patch
#1 introduces
the issue, yet doesn't also fix it.

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index c8629a656b42..0c6f5fe6f382 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1084,23 +1084,35 @@ static void arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  {
>         void __iomem *gr0_base = ARM_SMMU_GR0(smmu);
>         u32 smr;
> +       int idx;
>
>         if (!smmu->smrs)
>                 return;
>
> +       for (idx = 0; idx < smmu->num_mapping_groups; idx++) {
> +               smr = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(idx));
> +               if (!(smr & SMR_VALID))
> +                       break;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (idx == smmu->num_mapping_groups) {
> +               dev_err(smmu->dev, "Unable to compute streamid_mask\n");
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
>         /*
>          * SMR.ID bits may not be preserved if the corresponding MASK
>          * bits are set, so check each one separately. We can reject
>          * masters later if they try to claim IDs outside these masks.
>          */
>         smr = smmu->streamid_mask << SMR_ID_SHIFT;
> -       writel_relaxed(smr, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(0));
> -       smr = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(0));
> +       writel_relaxed(smr, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(idx));
> +       smr = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(idx));
>         smmu->streamid_mask = smr >> SMR_ID_SHIFT;
>
>         smr = smmu->streamid_mask << SMR_MASK_SHIFT;
> -       writel_relaxed(smr, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(0));
> -       smr = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(0));
> +       writel_relaxed(smr, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(idx));
> +       smr = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(idx));
>         smmu->smr_mask_mask = smr >> SMR_MASK_SHIFT;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.18.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives