linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 16/31] docs: rbtree.txt: fix Sphinx build warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <c4774c673745b441f37a29d6734a49f0772cf2d5.1560364494.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:38:19 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: [PATCH v1 16/31] docs: rbtree.txt: fix Sphinx build warnings

Ths file is already at ReST format. Yet, some recent changes
made it to produce a few warnings when building it with
Sphinx.

Those are trivially fixed by marking some literal blocks.

Fix them before adding it to the docs building system.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/rbtree.txt | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/rbtree.txt b/Documentation/rbtree.txt
index c42a21b99046..523d54b60087 100644
--- a/Documentation/rbtree.txt
+++ b/Documentation/rbtree.txt
@@ -204,21 +204,21 @@ potentially expensive tree iterations. This is done at negligible runtime
 overhead for maintanence; albeit larger memory footprint.
 
 Similar to the rb_root structure, cached rbtrees are initialized to be
-empty via:
+empty via::
 
   struct rb_root_cached mytree = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
 
 Cached rbtree is simply a regular rb_root with an extra pointer to cache the
 leftmost node. This allows rb_root_cached to exist wherever rb_root does,
 which permits augmented trees to be supported as well as only a few extra
-interfaces:
+interfaces::
 
   struct rb_node *rb_first_cached(struct rb_root_cached *tree);
   void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *, struct rb_root_cached *, bool);
   void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root_cached *);
 
 Both insert and erase calls have their respective counterpart of augmented
-trees:
+trees::
 
   void rb_insert_augmented_cached(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root_cached *,
 				  bool, struct rb_augment_callbacks *);
-- 
2.21.0