lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190612125817.42909d83@x1.home>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:58:17 -0600
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        keith.busch@...el.com, mike.campin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI/IOV: Fix incorrect cfg_size for VF > 0

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:41:36 -0700
sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
wrote:

> On 6/12/19 11:19 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:06:47 -0700
> > sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> >  
> >> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Commit 975bb8b4dc93 ("PCI/IOV: Use VF0 cached config space size for
> >> other VFs") calculates and caches the cfg_size for VF0 device before
> >> initializing the pcie_cap of the device which results in using incorrect
> >> cfg_size for all VF devices > 0. So set pcie_cap of the device before
> >> calculating the cfg_size of VF0 device.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 975bb8b4dc93 ("PCI/IOV: Use VF0 cached config space size for
> >> other VFs")
> >> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> >> Suggested-by: Mike Campin <mike.campin@...el.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes since v1:
> >>   * Fixed a typo in commit message.
> >>
> >>   drivers/pci/iov.c | 1 +
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> >> index 3aa115ed3a65..2869011c0e35 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> >> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ int pci_iov_add_virtfn(struct pci_dev *dev, int id)
> >>   	virtfn->device = iov->vf_device;
> >>   	virtfn->is_virtfn = 1;
> >>   	virtfn->physfn = pci_dev_get(dev);
> >> +	virtfn->pcie_cap = pci_find_capability(virtfn, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> >>   
> >>   	if (id == 0)
> >>   		pci_read_vf_config_common(virtfn);  
> > Why not re-order until after we've setup pcie_cap?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190604143617.0a226555@x1.home/T/#  
> 
> pci_read_vf_config_common() also caches values for properties like 
> class, hdr_type, susbsystem_vendor/device. These values are read/used in 
> pci_setup_device(). So if we can use cached values in 
> pci_setup_device(), we don't have to read them from registers twice for 
> each device.

Sorry, I missed that dependency, a bit too subtle.  It's still pretty
ugly that pci_setup_device()->set_pcie_port_type() is the canonical
location for setting pcie_cap and now we need to kludge it earlier.
What about the question in the self follow-up to my patch in the link
above, can we simply assume 4K config space on a VF?  Thanks,

Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ