linux-kernel - [PATCH] binder: fix possible UAF when freeing buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190612202927.54518-1-tkjos@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:29:27 -0700
From:   Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>
To:     tkjos@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arve@...roid.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        maco@...gle.com
Cc:     joel@...lfernandes.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH] binder: fix possible UAF when freeing buffer

There is a race between the binder driver cleaning
up a completed transaction via binder_free_transaction()
and a user calling binder_ioctl(BC_FREE_BUFFER) to
release a buffer. It doesn't matter which is first but
they need to be protected against running concurrently
which can result in a UAF.

Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
---
 drivers/android/binder.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index 748ac489ef7eb..bc26b5511f0a9 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -1941,8 +1941,18 @@ static void binder_free_txn_fixups(struct binder_transaction *t)
 
 static void binder_free_transaction(struct binder_transaction *t)
 {
-	if (t->buffer)
-		t->buffer->transaction = NULL;
+	struct binder_proc *target_proc = t->to_proc;
+
+	if (target_proc) {
+		binder_inner_proc_lock(target_proc);
+		if (t->buffer)
+			t->buffer->transaction = NULL;
+		binder_inner_proc_unlock(target_proc);
+	}
+	/*
+	 * If the transaction has no target_proc, then
+	 * t->buffer->transaction has already been cleared.
+	 */
 	binder_free_txn_fixups(t);
 	kfree(t);
 	binder_stats_deleted(BINDER_STAT_TRANSACTION);
@@ -3551,10 +3561,12 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc,
 static void
 binder_free_buf(struct binder_proc *proc, struct binder_buffer *buffer)
 {
+	binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
 	if (buffer->transaction) {
 		buffer->transaction->buffer = NULL;
 		buffer->transaction = NULL;
 	}
+	binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
 	if (buffer->async_transaction && buffer->target_node) {
 		struct binder_node *buf_node;
 		struct binder_work *w;
-- 
2.22.0.rc2.383.gf4fbbf30c2-goog