[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190612174119.7c0d94bd@coco.lan>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:41:19 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 29/31] docs: nvdimm: convert to ReST
Em Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:04:12 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:38 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Rename the mtd documentation files to ReST, add an
>
> s/mtd/nvdimm/
Sorry, cut and paste issue :-)
>
> > index for them and adjust in order to produce a nice html
> > output via the Sphinx build system.
> >
> > At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to
> > the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings.
>
> Looks ok, but I was not able to apply this one in isolation to give it
> a try. Am I missing some pre-reqs compared to v5.2-rc4?
I wrote the patch before v5.2-rc1, but, as this series touches a lot
of stuff, it was rebased against today's linux-next (next-20190612).
I didn't notice an conflict on this specific file during the rebases
though.
There is a simple patch applied on linux-next after v5.2-rc4:
commit 3d9cf48b2ca257f1a249b347236098c3cf9d54f1
Author: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu May 9 15:40:49 2019 +0800
Documentation: nvdimm: Fix typo
Remove the extra 'we '.
Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Could this be the cause of the issue you're noticing when
trying to apply it?
As this is signed-off by Jon, I suspect it went via docs-next.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists