lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGRyCJGFKf4q5yCV2ntZabU0ct8pfUKvN6x6L2A5C2U+g25nkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:58:48 +0200
From:   Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@...il.com>
To:     Sujeev Dias <sdias@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, truong@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: MHI code review

Hi Sujeev,

Il giorno mer 12 giu 2019 alle ore 19:54 Sujeev Dias
<sdias@...eaurora.org> ha scritto:
>
> Hi Daniels
>
> Sorry for delay response.  Yes, we will be pushing new set of series very
> soon that will have support for 55 as well.  The series that's pushed should
> already work for SDX20, 24 and 55.   There are some new features related to
> 55 that's not yet in series.
>

great, thanks for the update! I'll wait for you new patch-set.

Thanks,
Daniele

> Thanks
> Sujeev
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@...il.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 8:11 AM
> To: sdias@...eaurora.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; truong@...eaurora.org; dnlplm@...il.com
> Subject: Re: MHI code review
>
> Hi Sujeev,
>
> > Hi Greg Kroah-Hartman\Arnd Bergmann and community
> >
> > Thank you for all the feedback, I believe I have addressed all the
> > comments from previous patches. Also, I am excluding mhi network
> > driver in this series. I still have some modifications to do.
> >
> > Please review the new patch series and share your feedback.
> >
> > Thanks again
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Sujeev
>
> are you going to continue working on this series?
>
> Can this series be used with PCIe SDX20/24/55 based modems?
>
> If yes, it would really be important to have this integrated into an
> official kernel.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniele
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ