[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58787543-76d3-e0db-9517-ccd0f6494d85@c-s.fr>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:52:13 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Additional fixes on Talitos driver
Le 11/06/2019 à 18:30, Horia Geanta a écrit :
> On 6/11/2019 6:40 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 11/06/2019 à 17:37, Horia Geanta a écrit :
>>> On 6/11/2019 5:39 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> This series is the last set of fixes for the Talitos driver.
>>>>
>>>> We now get a fully clean boot on both SEC1 (SEC1.2 on mpc885) and
>>>> SEC2 (SEC2.2 on mpc8321E) with CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_EXTRA_TESTS:
>>>>
>>> I am getting below failures on a sec 3.3.2 (p1020rdb) for hmac(sha384) and
>>> hmac(sha512):
>>
>> Is that new with this series or did you already have it before ?
>>
> Looks like this happens with or without this series.
Found the issue, that's in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=b8fbdc2bc4e71b62646031d5df5f08aafe15d5ad
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TALITOS_SEC2 should be CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TALITOS2 instead.
Just sent a patch to fix it.
Thanks
Christophe
>
> I haven't checked the state of this driver for quite some time.
> Since I've noticed increased activity, I thought it would be worth
> actually testing the changes.
>
> Are changes in patch 2/4 ("crypto: talitos - fix hash on SEC1.")
> strictly for sec 1.x or they affect all revisions?
>
>> What do you mean by "fuzz testing" enabled ? Is that
>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_EXTRA_TESTS or something else ?
>>
> Yes, it's this config symbol.
>
> Horia
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists