[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6fe6400-8fdd-cb53-f7e1-ac6188c9e785@web.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:24:12 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: api: add devm_platform_ioremap_resource script
>> The flag “IORESOURCE_MEM” is passed as the second parameter for the call
>> of the function “platform_get_resource” in this refactoring.
>
> In that particular case, we maybe should consider separate inline
> helpers instead of passing this is a parameter.
>
> Maybe it would even be more efficient to have completely separate
> versions of devm_platform_ioremap_resource(), so we don't even have
> to pass that parameter on stack.
Would you like to add another function which should be called instead of
the combination of the functions “platform_get_resource” and “devm_ioremap_resource”?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists