linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Make IPA use PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:27:31 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>, edubezval@...il.com,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, javi.merino@...nel.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, amit.kachhap@...il.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, ionela.voinescu@....com,
        mka@...omium.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Make IPA use PM_EM

On 12/06/2019 11:13, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thursday 30 May 2019 at 10:20:35 (+0100), Quentin Perret wrote:
>> Changes in v5:
>> **************
>>  - Changed patch 02 to guard IPA-specific code in cpu_cooling.c with
>>    appropriate ifdefery (Daniel)
>>  - Rebased on 5.2-rc2
> 
> Is there anything else I can do on this series ? Should I send a v6 with
> Viresh's and Daniel's Acked-by ?

No need to send a V6 if there are no changes in the patches. The
maintainer will take care of collecting the tags (which is usually
automatic when using the patchwork tools).


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog