linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] page cache: Store only head pages in i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 04:46:34 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] page cache: Store only head pages in i_pages

On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 10:47:35PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Matthew Wilcox (2019-03-07 15:30:51)
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 404acdcd0455..aaf88f85d492 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2456,6 +2456,9 @@ static void __split_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> >                         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHMEM) && PageSwapBacked(head))
> >                                 shmem_uncharge(head->mapping->host, 1);
> >                         put_page(head + i);
> > +               } else if (!PageAnon(page)) {
> > +                       __xa_store(&head->mapping->i_pages, head[i].index,
> > +                                       head + i, 0);
> 
> Forgiving the ignorant copy'n'paste, this is required:
> 
> +               } else if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> +                       swp_entry_t entry = { .val = page_private(head + i) };
> +                       __xa_store(&swap_address_space(entry)->i_pages,
> +                                  swp_offset(entry),
> +                                  head + i, 0);
>                 }
>         }
>  
> The locking is definitely wrong.

Does it help with the problem, or it's just a possible lead?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov