linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] s390/crypto: sha: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:30:23 +0200
From:   Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] s390/crypto: sha: Use -ENODEV instead of
 -EOPNOTSUPP

On 12.06.19 12:22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's use the error value that is typically used if HW support is not
> available when trying to load a module - this is also what systemd's
> systemd-modules-load.service expects.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c   | 2 +-
>  arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c | 2 +-
>  arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c
> index 009572e8276d..7c15542d3685 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static struct shash_alg alg = {
>  static int __init sha1_s390_init(void)
>  {
>  	if (!cpacf_query_func(CPACF_KIMD, CPACF_KIMD_SHA_1))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	return crypto_register_shash(&alg);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c
> index 62833a1d8724..af7505148f80 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int __init sha256_s390_init(void)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!cpacf_query_func(CPACF_KIMD, CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	ret = crypto_register_shash(&sha256_alg);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto out;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c
> index be589c340d15..ad29db085a18 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int __init init(void)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!cpacf_query_func(CPACF_KIMD, CPACF_KIMD_SHA_512))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	if ((ret = crypto_register_shash(&sha512_alg)) < 0)
>  		goto out;
>  	if ((ret = crypto_register_shash(&sha384_alg)) < 0)
fine with me
Reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>